Discussing Impression Formation Essay -- Psychology, Solomon Asch

Impression fundamental law and stereotypesFirst impressions be considered very important. It is very common to hear spate talk about the importance of giving a good kickoff impression because that very first moment in which people find or meet someone new, shows them the kind of person they are most likely to be.How is personality impressions earned? Do first impressions have a much greater impact on judgements than subsequent impressions?How first impressions are formed has been a subject of interest by many researchers in the area of psychology. Past research in this subject suggests that primacy effects comprise in impression formation. Solomon Asch (1946) conducted a muse to see how people form impressions. Participants were given a set of traits describing a person. The list included Warm, Cold, polite or blunt (among others). Participants rated the Generosity, Happiness, sociability and popularity (among other actors line) of the new person. One score was that we fo rm impressions development some kind of gestalt or whole picture, with distributively piece of information influencing the others. An intelligent & warm person generates a cocksure impression an intelligent & cold person generates a negative impression. Aschs experiments on formations of personality impression suggested that when adjectives describing a person are presented in sequence, the first adjectives have more impact than the later ones. The same words used to describe a person could produce very variant ratings of that person depending on the order in which the words were presented. When adjectives with more confident(p) meaning were given first followed by words with less affirmative meaning, the participants tended to rate that person more positively, but when t... ... saying what they think or believe.Taking all this information into consideration, the present study sought to investigate the effects occupational stereotypes have on forming impressions and personal ity judgements. The aim of the study was to see how different groups of participant rated a photograph of an unknown single on things such as likability, wealth, education and status. This was done by using three separate groups, the same face was used on distributively image but the job title was changed for each test group. The experimental hypothesis states that the participants would rate the lower class job titles lower on likeability and financial status and the higher class job titles higher on wealth and likeability. The hypothesis being that the job title of solicitor would be rated higher in all aspects of likeability than the job title of Dustbin man.