Why women failed to gain the vote between 1900 and 1914?

The wo manpowers right to vote movements were originaly from the joined States during the 19th Century. In colonial America, as elsewhere(Austrialia and new zealand in the world speci onlyy Britain, civil law did non complete the equality of men and women. almost men thought that umteen women were a be adrift and can neer be in force(p) as men. During 1900 and 1914 a fair sex had no legal recompense fields. A married womens place belonged to her keep up, this included earnings as advantageously as entirely her property and profounds. in separate words she was like a mere object in the mans hands.To todays standards this is on the whole protruderageous, in todays society women can contain to be treated exactly as the opposite sex when it comes to work and other things. This is abundant in the rise of popularity of cleaning ladys football and fe young-be acquire(prenominal) boxing. During the 1800, women were expected to be meliorate in those days a correct la dy would be expected to consecrate a pale face, do absolutely no exercise and watch genuinely delicate constitution, they where expected to be good hostesses and sure as shooting chicane their place in society. Women never tied(p) received the resembling level of education as men. ome women nerver level(p) so got eduction. They were considered as world too preposterous for high education. However non all women where satisfied with their position in life.They repulsed that they were stuck in a vicious circle, which if not impossible, would be actually difficult to break out of. The earlier years of the 20th centruary in Britian saw a concerted carry for the right to ballot for women. the womens social and semi policy- qualification union, otherwise known as the suffragettes, was founded in 1903 by the Pankhurst family. he campaign for the right to suffrage for women among 1905 and 1914 became increasingly belligerent as women were prepared to take straight off a ction, such as distruption of meetings, chaining themselves to railings outside 10 downing driveway, smashing windows and rioting. at peerless stage the prime minister,s country class was fire bombed. as a yield of this some(prenominal) suffragettes found themselves inside holloway prison where they resorted to hungry strikes. the prison aouthorities responded with forcible feeding. in that respect is no simple answer wherefore the suffrage movement failed mingled with 1900 and 1914, instead, a series of long and short terminal figure causes. The main point of this essay is to analyze, as well as talk over these reasons in detail. If possible I will direct them in order of importance. women where treated very harshly in the 1900 as they were objects in front on mens eyes. when a woman got married all her belongings wer transfered to her husband and they were now the property of the husband. in other words married women were legally d.o.a. in the eyes of the law. omen ha d no property rights, all thier property was thier husbands. all women were robbed off thier self-confidence and self-respect and this do them totalyy dependent on men.No woman could get eduction since no college or university would undertake women students but at that place were 1 or 2 exceptions. the women cute the vote becouse they treasured to be equaly nown in public as men. needed there rights. wanted thier belongings. wanted to be rembered for somethin. wanted to deliver the right to vote and contribute a aphorism in the country. anted people to hear what they occupy to say about how the country is run. The Suffragists were called the pipe up sisterhood, branded as unfeminine, and accused of iniquity and drunkenness. Many citizens and a great transmit of newspapers where strongly against The National Union Of Womens voting Societies. Suffragist leaders were often subjected to physical abuse. Suffragist meetings were repeatedly stormed and stop by street gangs. On many occasions the speaker at a suffragist meeting would train a revolver to discourage possible attacks from the audience.However, it was not only men that were against the suffragist movement, many, if not nearly upper-class women were against the movement, including Queen Victoria. There were many reasons why anti-suffragists felt this way. The anti-suffragists partly found their assumptions on the difference between the male and female physical abilities they did not discuss the biological difference because they did not believe it was appropriate for public discussion. Instead, emphasis was adjust on the fragility of the women claiming that this is what made her unsuited for the vote.The physical impuissance of the female would be potentially dangerous. They argues that take for granted she reached the polling place, she might get caught up in a brawl and given the womens inwrought fragility, she would be the one to get hurt. beyond these reasons existed the belief th at allowing women to vote would jeopardize the nations security department and lead, ultimately, to war. One leader of the anti-suffragists said Allowing women to vote would lead to foreign aggression and war. The indorsement areas of difference between men and women which the antis argued, was the topic of morality.A anti who spoke at a hearing in com projecterized tomography on womens suffrage observed that The roughly convincing reason I boast heard was the one offered by cast off Pearson. We want the ballot, and we want it when we want it. This shows the erudition of intelligence. The anti-suffragists also predicted that if women were given the vote black-market results would occur. The antis believed that political involvement would put them in situations were the male vulnerability would be exploited. However, preceding(prenominal) all the anti-suffragists were afraid about the horny state of women.Men where described as rational and emotionally stable, women wer e portrayed as high strung, tense, irritable and irrational. One anti said that when women generally vote and hold office, the desire for publicity and love of the limelight will combine to produce a form of cult. Some took this idea get on and argued that since all women suffragists bordered on hysteria there was no need to take their arguments seriously. They said that when women vote, she would let her feelings rather past her intellectual concern be the main reasons for their voteSome more quaint people said that allowing women to imbibe the vote would breed a nation of transvestites and that women could cloud extra voting slips in their big sleeves The position of certain key political parties was also a huge ratifier to why women never got the vote between 1900 and 1914. For if women wanted the vote, ultimately if would induce been the MPs that they would have had to convince. Many backbench large MPs were supporters of votes for women, but the large leaders were o pposed to it.This was because they feared that, if only better-off, property owning women got the vote, these women would vote for their arch rival, the Conservative troupe. On the other hand, some conservative leaders, propensity the prospect of more conservative voters, were instead keen on womens suffrage. But they took no action because their backbench MPs were completely opposed, on principle, to multifariousness the role of women. In addition, both parties had bigger worries then female suffrage. Neither party was prepared to adopt female suffrage as party policy, so it never got priority in parliament.In 1903, many suffragists where angry at the lack of victory that had come their way, as a result, a lady called Mrs. Emmeline Pankhurst founded a new organization, which was called the Womens friendly and Political Union or WSPU in short. The Daily Mail called then the suffragettes and with them fashioning so many headlines this name became demanding to shake off. The s uffragettes had the same mark and ambitions as the suffragists, however, they believed that the only way to reach their goal was to become more etymon and militant. The suffragettes disrupted political meeting and repeatedly harass ministers.Asquith, who at that magazine was a Liberal Prime Minister, came under particularly expectant abuse due to his views on women suffrage. they physically assulted politicans, destroyed paintings in the national trend and in 1913 emily davison threw herself under the kings horse and was killed. there groundless tactics may have lots support for the camaign. After a womens suffrage bill ran out of time in 1908, direct action from the suffragettes began. The suffragettes began making speeches at 10 Downing street, they even chained themselves to railing to stop being moved on, in doing so getting themselves arrested.In that same year stones where throw thought the windows of 10 Downing street There was however logic hobo the rage. The suffra gettes believed that the presidential term ignored the calls for women suffrage because there where more important issues. The Suffragettes believed that by beseeming more radical and violent the government where forced to listen whether they liked it or not, they believed that processions and petitions, however large, were easily ignored. the goverment di not want to be seen to give in to the violent demandss as this would mak them look weak.There where assorted reactions to the Direct Action that the Suffragettes employed. Some people where worried, some sympathetic and some were scornful. It was the reaction from the Suffragists that impress people the most. Many suffragists admired the avidity of suffragettes to go to jail for the cause. When the original suffragette was imprisoned, Mrs. Fawcett put on a banquet for them when they where released. This did not last, for as the Suffragettes got more violent and radical the further apart the two groups got, relationships betwe en then become very strained.The suffragists believed that you lingo win the right for a parliamentary vote by using authoritarian methods, they also believed that the violence would put of the MPs that would have backed their cause. There is no doubt that the increase in violence confused the support for womans suffrage. By 1913 many suffragettes where imprisoned. The violence did however achieve one of its goals, it certainly raised the profile of the issue and it could not longer be ignored. But in doing so they damaged the bigger picture, for know there was a reason for their opponents for rejecting womans suffrage.If the MPs gave in to the violence from the suffragettes what hope will they have when dockers or mine workers riot for higher wages? From 1911 onwards, whenever the issue of womans suffrage was debated in parliament, there was a bigger volume against womens suffrage. In 1914 Britain declared war in Germany, from August to September many diverse womens organiza tions were set up, including the Womens Hospital Corp and the Womens law Volunteers. This meant that all suffragist and suffragette campaigns had to be halted.I conceptualise that the most important reason for why the women suffrage was unsuccessful during 1900 and the 1914 was the fact that, peoples minds at that time where not prepared for such a big advancement, it is true that the suffragettes minify their chances significantly, but I believe that even if there was no violence the women would have still not got the vote until by and by the war becouse that is when they really proved themsleves as they helped out greatly in the first world war.